It depends on what your NEEDS are for midi, simple as that.Īs a Cubase user here most dont even use 10% of the functions in a said area in their DAW. I've made that choice and its Reaper all the way. You should try both and decide what's important for you. Clearly both Cubase and Reaper can produce outstanding pro-quality results and are packed with features. How do you define "best"? No one can, so all you have left is to ask yourself what works for you. "Best" (as in "best for MIDI") is a meaningless word here, subjective at best. Does it have the features you need? Do you like the interface? Can you be productive using it? Does it make you happy? Then Reaper is for you. ![]() If things in it work for you, you should use it. Is Reaper a great DAW? Yes, of course it is. Does it have the features you need? Do you like the interface? Can you be productive using it? Does it make you happy? Then Cubase is for you. Is Cubase a great DAW? Yes, of course it is. In the end, there are two things that matter. For me, after I got used to it, it worked just fine, and I can manipulate MIDI precisely how I would wish to most of the time. But I don't know why people say this it's usually (when you dig into it) because someone says that there's a MIDI thing they liked on some other software that Reaper doesn't do quite the same way. ![]() How relevant is this to MIDI? Well, I have sometimes read that Reaper's MIDI implementation can leave a bit to be desired. If you need to find that stuff, you can do a search on the actions list. ![]() But hidden in its menus are a whole bunch of clever groovy things that make music production easy. Ok, I'm not talking about instruments built in, or a sexy brand with corners on its letters. Now, the thing is, Reaper has more stuff, really. Then I discovered Reaper, and discovered that, perhaps unlike some other DAWs (like Ableton or FL Studio), Reaper is an easy leap for a Cubase user. So I was a Cubase user for years and years, and didn't even know Reaper existed. you should download and try both and make up your own mind. It's just the circle of fifths.Īnyway, that's my opinion. Very intuitive and fast.Ī lot of people talk about the chord finder like it's some kind of magical tool that will help you write music. In Reaper, all these functions are available from the mouse. In Cubase, it's three separate key strokes to insert, edit and delete MIDI notes. The simplest example to demonstrate the difference: I don't know who designed Cubase's system - but that person is not me. My method of working is the fastest for me. In Reaper I can use the radial menu to drop all sorts of chords, arpeggiate things and a whole load of stuff that I need to do. ![]() Extremely inefficient, and it feels like wearing a straight jacket compared to Reaper. '' load up kontakt load 4 sample libraries with multi mic recording (spitfire or cinesmaples etc.I think the people who say this basically grew up with Cubase so have internalized that as the 'right' way to do stuff.įrom my perspective, Cubase's MIDI was average at best. the worst offender is fl try to use a multi timbral synth / sampler in it and you will rather go to hell than setup a multi timbral synth / sampler with multiple midi imputes and multiple audio outputsįor those fl fanboys hear is a challenge for you try to do this and tell me hoe long it takes In cubase/nuendo you can easily setup a external synth in the software and use it as a vstĪnd in other daws getting something done even for an experienced user takes forever. In other daws its an absolute pain to set them up Popular doesn't always means better for an example fl is probably the most popular daw but its harder to ues than a dx7 and the workflow is made like a factory in that context reaper is better than flĪll and all nuendo 11 is the best, most powerful, versatile daw (like do you get a such a good expression mapping future in other dawsĭon't get me even started on externa synth and fx So yes nuendo and his little brother cubase are the most powerful and the most interutive daw In logic audio editing capabilities are low and in pro tools the midi editing features are basically from the dark ages The only other daws that can even come close are logic and protools Do you get dolby atmos intergraded rendering in reaper, NO !!
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |